Which type of test is NOT typically automated?

Exploratory testing is primarily human-driven and involves manual exploration of the application to discover issues, usability concerns, and unforeseen behavior. Testers engage in this process using their creativity and intuition, allowing them to adapt their testing strategy based on immediate feedback and observations. Unlike automated testing, where tests are scripted and run without human intervention, exploratory testing relies significantly on a tester’s experience, skill, and adaptability to identify potential problems in the software.

In contrast, unit, performance, and functional tests are often automated due to their repetitive nature and the need for consistent execution across multiple iterations of the software. Automated tests are more efficient for these types because they can be run frequently as part of continuous integration and continuous deployment (CI/CD) processes and can provide quick feedback on specific aspects of the software's functionality and performance.