In Scrum, why is constant peer review important?

Constant peer review in Scrum is pivotal for maintaining high code quality. This practice fosters a collaborative environment where team members can review each other’s work, providing constructive feedback and identifying potential issues early in the development process. By regularly examining code, the team can ensure that best practices are followed, adherence to coding standards is maintained, and any bugs or vulnerabilities are addressed before they escalate into larger problems.

Additionally, peer reviews encourage knowledge sharing among team members, which helps in building a deeper understanding of the codebase and promotes collective ownership of the work. This process not only leads to improvements in individual code quality but also enhances the overall quality of the product, supporting the Scrum principle of delivering working increments of potentially releasable software at the end of each Sprint.

In contrast, while other options may touch on aspects of the development process, they do not capture the critical role that peer reviews play in sustaining high-quality outputs in a Scrum environment.