Which of the following is NOT a way the Development Team can ensure a good application architecture?

The idea that defining architecture only at the start of the project is not a valid way for the Development Team to ensure good application architecture highlights the importance of adaptability in software development. Good architecture is a dynamic and ongoing concern rather than a one-time decision.

Defining architecture solely at the beginning can lead to inflexibility and may not account for changes or evolving requirements during the project. As development progresses and new insights and challenges arise, the architecture may need to be refined and adjusted to accommodate these factors. Continuous communication and collaboration with the team about architectural decisions, working iteratively on the architecture alongside coding and problem-solving, ensures that the architecture remains relevant and effectively supports the goals of the project.

Additionally, maintaining comprehensive documentation of architectural decisions ensures that all team members are aligned and can reference the rationale behind certain architectural choices. This ongoing conversation and documentation foster a culture that values architecture as an integral part of the development process. By encouraging adaptability and continuous discussion, the team can better respond to the changing landscape of requirements and technologies throughout the project's lifespan.