Which two factors should be most considered when establishing the length of a Sprint?

When establishing the length of a Sprint, the risk of being disconnected from stakeholders is indeed a crucial factor to consider. Sprints are time-boxed iterations that produce increments of work, and solid communication with stakeholders is vital to ensure that the team is aligned with business goals and user needs. If the Sprint length is too long, there is a greater risk of the team working in isolation, leading to misalignments with stakeholder expectations. This can result in a final product that does not meet stakeholder needs or is outdated by the time it is delivered. Shorter Sprints promote regular feedback loops and ensure that the team remains connected with stakeholders throughout the development process, allowing for adjustments based on feedback, new insights, or changing priorities.

Focusing on maintaining strong communication with stakeholders through appropriately timed Sprint reviews and planning sessions directly benefits the overall project's success and adaptability. Hence, prioritizing the risk of disconnection when deciding on Sprint length is essential for fostering collaboration and aligning the team's output with the broader goals of the organization.