Which two methods of creating Development Teams align with Scrum's values?

Creating Development Teams that align with Scrum's values emphasizes self-organization and empowering individuals within the framework. When existing teams propose how to organize and self-organize into new structures, they are actively participating in the decision-making process. This respects their autonomy and promotes accountability, which are key aspects of Scrum's values.

Self-organization allows teams to leverage their unique knowledge, skills, and team dynamics to form structures that are most effective for them. This method fosters collaboration and encourages developers to take ownership of their team’s formation, which aligns with the principle of valuing individuals and interactions over processes and tools.

On the other hand, bringing together all developers to let them self-organize also resonates with Scrum's values. However, option A highlights an established team's initiative and understanding of their dynamics, making it slightly more aligned with Scrum's emphasis on iterative feedback and adaptation during team formation.

Such approaches encourage a culture of trust, openness, and respect—fundamental ingredients for a successful Scrum environment. In contrast, random assignments or team formations based solely on hierarchical factors like seniority negate the self-organizing nature that Scrum champions, leading to teams that may not be as effective or cohesive.